Skip to main content


Being the sort who can’t write books that are all the same market, I’ve found myself straddling the various worlds of publishing.  

This week, I’ve been knocking around some indie resource sites. Trad authors, take note – if you ever want to know how to market yourself and your book, go talk to the indies. They know so much about how Amazon works, where to get reviews, about blog tours and hops, mailing lists and loads of other goodies. The work they put into marketing their books – with no publisher support, remember – and building their brand is jaw-dropping. I have huge respect for them.

So, of course, me being me and wanting to do well at this writing lark, I should have immediately ran off and explored All The Things. But I didn’t.

Why not…?

Partly this is to do with the law of diminishing returns. I’ve tried multiple book sites that list my book on offer (speaking of which, Inish Carraig is 99p next week… just saying…) and, frankly, the returns are rarely much more than I spent on the promo, especially once I calculate the time to set it all up. Next week, I have an ad on Book Barbarian (who I find always bring me in more sales than the cost of the ad) and that’s it. Sure, I could go and place some more, and I’d get more sales and better ranking but that would fall off quickly. It’s not worth the additional effort for me.

Ditto, review chasing. I know, I know, I know, I need reviews. I know some authors who are very good at getting reviews. They ask people directly for them, they are happy to contact those who’ve liked the book and suggest a review. Others are great at finding bloggers who review books.

For me, reviews mean most when they’re genuine and not sought. When someone liked my books enough to want to leave them. I know this is naïve, I know it goes against Marketing 101, but I’d rather have ten really honest reviews, than 10 that came in because I chased them. I think it shows in the review, when someone wrote it just because they wanted to and not because they thought they had to.

Last week, the first ARC reader of Waters and the Wild, the wonderful Annie Rose, fed back to me that they’d loved the book and were planning to tell everyone they knew that they loved the book and recommend it. That, to me, is worth ten Amazon reviews. Ditto this week when I had a surprise review go up in a well-respected journal. I like that it happened outside the Amazon sales-obsession bubble, that it wasn’t written to bring me up to the magic-50 review number, but because the reviewer found the book to have merit. That means more than any amount of drummed-up-to-bring-sales reviews could (and carries much more influence).

This publishing world never stops. I could rejoin a marketing site and pay some money to them and it could be just as wasted as the first time I did. I could book a sales-outlet a day next week and sell a hundred extra books for one week only. I could join more forums and spend less time on the ones I like, and have greater reach but less impact (and considerably more stress).

Etc etc.

There is, honestly, no end to what I could do to be better at marketing, to get more margin, to receive more reviews. But I don't think I want to do it all.

So, what now? If I don’t want to do the things that successful indie authors do am I dooming myself to failure?

I don’t think so – because I’m not sure all the widgets and knowledge equal success. Certainly, not all of the authors using them seem to be breaking through – just like in every corner of the publishing world, some don’t. I don’t think they guarantee success any more than a dream-trad-publishing contract does. I do think they guarantee stress for me and that I’d be constantly measuring myself against expectations and others’ sales.

Just as in my consultancy work I can decide what works for me, how much to market and where and why, so I need to do in writing. Within that choice, there is a balance – and it’s up to me to find that balance. I think, in exploring the indie world, I’ve found my line in the sand. I’ve realised where I don’t want to waste my writing time (because, make no mistake, writing marketing time is stolen from my writing time), and where I am happy to (this blog!) and it’s liberating to do so. 

Because, in deciding, I haven’t failed. Instead, I’ve chosen.


A.C.Flory said…
Yes. :)

In case you haven't read it, David Gaughran's posted an interesting but daunting article about making Amazon's 'Also Boughts' work for you. I read it and cried because I hadn't even considered it. Sadly, I doubt that I'll be able to consider it for some time to come. Instead, I'll continue to do the tortoise thing and build a following the slow way. -sigh-
Joanne Zebedee said…
Wow. That is scary. Not a single product points to Inish Carraig. Crap.

Popular posts from this blog

A NATURAL HISTORY OF GOBLINS - a guest blog by Teresa Edgerton

Some fantasy writers like to write about elves, others prefer werewolves, vampires, or zombies. I have a penchant for goblins.

In folklore, the word "goblin" has been applied in myriad ways. A goblin might be a mischievous sprite like Puck, a hideous, vengeful ghost, or even a beneficient house spirit such as a brownie. Sometimes it was used as a synonym for fairy, sometimes applied to a separate race: small, ugly, and malicious. I've taken advantage of this ambiguity, and in each series of books I've written where goblins appear, I've reinvented them.

In the second Celydonn series (sequels to The Green Lion Trilogy) they are fuathan, bad fairies if you will. I like writing about fairies. Even the best of them are not nice; they are not benevolent. On occasion they may be extravagently generous. Grateful for small favors, they return them with magnificent gifts and spectacular rewards. But you cannot trust them. Their morality is not our morality, their laws…

Getting hearts racing, an interview with fantasy-romance novelist Suzanne Jackson

Today I'm chatting with Suzanne Jackson, whose debut novel has been picked up by Venus Ascending, a new fantasy/sci-fi romance imprint headed up by Teresa Edgerton. I'm lucky enough to be a critique partner of Sue's, and can confirm that this book is something special with a great, unique world, sumptuous writing, a fantastic female lead, and the so-bad-he's-irresistible Nicholas Jarrett.
So I thought I'd be the first to nab the elusive Suzanne and find out what makes her - and her world - tick.


Firstly, tell us a little about your world, and how you've managed to marry fantasy with romance?

Hi, Jo. Thank you for inviting me onto your blog for my very first interview. I’m thrilled to be able to talk a little bit about my book and characters.
The Beguiler is set in a fantasy world similar in many ways to Georgian England. Many people are superstitious, with goo…


This week a theme has emerged over my conversations and interactions, almost organically. That theme is about communities and how they can give a voice and strength to the individuals within it. I’m a member of a range of writing communities. Some, such as Women Aloud and the SFFchronicles, I’m pretty central to. Some, less so:
Despite having a reputation for writing some dark scenes, my work isn’t dark enough to be classed as grimdark*. And I don’t read a whole heap of Grimdark books (the odd one slips through my eclectic book-selection part of my brain, but so does the odd macho-man romance.) But I like the Grimdark community grimdark fiction readers & writers – they’re funny and warm (I know, I know, they really need to up their grim credentials) and very welcoming. And moderated as tightly as a group needs to be. So, I hang around and post the odd comment and chat with the odd member – not that they’re all odd, of course – and that’s as far as it needs to go. The group have …