Skip to main content

SOCIAL MEDIA? WHY, WHERE, WHAT….




Last night I was having a discussion on a forum, when the subject came up of authors on social media, with the usual list of names and how they manage to interact with their fans. It occurred to me that this is a grey, murky area for writers.

As a fan, what do I expect from the authors I follow? I expect them to interact, to put up posts that keep me informed of their activity, that make me feel good about following them and that are reasonably entertaining.

No pressure, then.

As a writer, I started on social media with a few real-life mates, my family and some close online friends. My words were read by people who already knew me and, presumably, liked me. I bantered, I stuck up my political leanings (a little – I’m pretty circumspect, anyway), I didn’t really worry about what impression I might give anyone of me.

And then I released my book. Suddenly my blog began to be read much more widely. My twitter followers expanded to dwarf those I followed. My facebook friends became wider with more writers following me, and, later, readers.

Now, let’s be realistic here. I’m not madly popular. I’m not at household-fame status, even in my own household. I’m an indie author who’s probably, optimistically, starting to break through a little. Like a little pop in the bubble-wrapped ceiling that is a writing career. Yet, already, I feel things changing.

I’m much more circumspect what I post. I will often now like posts that make me smile but are full of non-pc elements, but not share (I have a filthy sense of humour). I’m much, much more careful what goes up of my family, aware that even my friends list is huge, let alone that most of my profile is set – necessarily – to public.

I don’t critique as much as I used to, and I’m more selective who to. I don’t want to be seen to be ripping shreds into a newby writer, me a published author – despite the fact my critique style is unchanged in years. When I blog now, I try to be more informative, less ranting for personal reasons.

Slowly, inexorably, I’ve become more professional in what goes onto SM. Which is fine. SM seems to be the platform I am most confident and accessible on. It makes sense for me to think about what I want to achieve on it.

But no one tells authors what to do. We expect them to go from larking around with their mates to interacting like pros without any guidance. What is too friendly? What is standoffish? How do you maintain the balance of multiple interactions, across multiple platforms, without spinning in circles? So, in the interest of discussion (and because, you know, it’s blog-day), here are some of the things I do to keep SM in-check, professional and not drive-me-insane busy.

  1. Multiple posts. For me, they’re a no-no. I know I can schedule my blog to go out at Friday every week, every three hours. I don’t do it. I post my blog once (sometimes, if it’s relevant to a discussion or a time of year, I’ll post it again months later.) I post it on facebook, on twitter, on google plus and on a couple of forums, and that’s it.

Usually, though, someone or ones is kind enough to retweet it, which keeps it active. Some of those do it in a new post, and I retweet those (which brings some traffic to the other SM account, so that’s a win-win). This way, yes, my blog might be posted by me three times – but each one is different. No one, but no one, but no one likes repeated content.

  1. Finding time. This is the killer. I could, quite literally, spend all day in forums and facebook. I have so many active groups and threads, I get a few alerts every minute. When I do post up something of interest, I get lots and lots more.

It is okay not to respond right away – provided you do, eventually, respond. Sometimes, that might only be a like because it’s also okay not to write back to everyone. I used to try to do that and it is no longer possible. I am only one person. Do what you can within your limits and remember the like-button is your friend.

  1. Being professional. This is entirely up to every writer. You are your own brand. Your publisher might set guidelines and there is an expectation you follow them, but outside that your online persona is your own. If you want to write voicey blogs that rant and curse, do so – it hasn’t hurt Chuck Wendig. If you’re not a blogger and think you have nothing interesting to say, become the person who can be relied on to know the relative effects of centrifugal force on a space-habitat and I can tell you, hand on heart, you will be a valued friend. If you like geeking, geek.

Being professional on social media doesn’t mean being soulless and formal. It doesn’t mean never showing anything of yourself. It does mean keeping your SM content representative of who you are. Your brand. For me, that’s chatty, informative blog posts, and a lot of chatty interaction with people. Oh, and pictures of jam once a year, because I’m always ridiculously proud when I make  it. That’s okay, too….

  1. Understanding that SM is just one parameter of writing intervention. Some do conventions instead. Some use newsletters, or their website and keep it up to date with content. Some use their publisher’s page. It’s up to you.

We are starting to feel as if, as writers, we have to get this SM. But we don’t know what ‘getting it’ entails. There is no norm. For every Neil Gaiman, interacting casually to so many people, there are ten other writers keeping it small and building up a loyal body of people interested.


  1. Whatever you do will be right for some people and wrong for others. That’s okay. That is life. You cannot please everyone. For each person who laughs their way through a Wendig blog, another will be offended and never go back. For every person who wants a personal response to their message about how much they love your book, another will cringe if the author goes back to them.

Once you accept you cannot win, but can only do your best, things get easier. You don’t like my online interactions, don’t friend me (but don’t, as someone recently did, tell me you want nothing to do with me and still remain friends. Neither of us will benefit from that, or feel comfortable – I cut the friendship). You like my blog but hate my posts, follow the blog only. It’s a big world and we cannot connect with anyone, on any medium.

6. Lastly – enjoy what you do. No one likes a complete misery (unless it’s Eeyore like mutterings we can snigger at). If you hate a platform, don’t do it. Really. We’re only here for a wee while, don’t make yourself do something you hate.

Comments

Anonymous said…
This is a outstanding read.
Joanne Zebedee said…
thank you so much, that's really kind. :)

Popular posts from this blog

A NATURAL HISTORY OF GOBLINS - a guest blog by Teresa Edgerton

Some fantasy writers like to write about elves, others prefer werewolves, vampires, or zombies. I have a penchant for goblins.

In folklore, the word "goblin" has been applied in myriad ways. A goblin might be a mischievous sprite like Puck, a hideous, vengeful ghost, or even a beneficient house spirit such as a brownie. Sometimes it was used as a synonym for fairy, sometimes applied to a separate race: small, ugly, and malicious. I've taken advantage of this ambiguity, and in each series of books I've written where goblins appear, I've reinvented them.

In the second Celydonn series (sequels to The Green Lion Trilogy) they are fuathan, bad fairies if you will. I like writing about fairies. Even the best of them are not nice; they are not benevolent. On occasion they may be extravagently generous. Grateful for small favors, they return them with magnificent gifts and spectacular rewards. But you cannot trust them. Their morality is not our morality, their laws…

Getting hearts racing, an interview with fantasy-romance novelist Suzanne Jackson

Today I'm chatting with Suzanne Jackson, whose debut novel has been picked up by Venus Ascending, a new fantasy/sci-fi romance imprint headed up by Teresa Edgerton. I'm lucky enough to be a critique partner of Sue's, and can confirm that this book is something special with a great, unique world, sumptuous writing, a fantastic female lead, and the so-bad-he's-irresistible Nicholas Jarrett.
So I thought I'd be the first to nab the elusive Suzanne and find out what makes her - and her world - tick.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Firstly, tell us a little about your world, and how you've managed to marry fantasy with romance?


Hi, Jo. Thank you for inviting me onto your blog for my very first interview. I’m thrilled to be able to talk a little bit about my book and characters.
The Beguiler is set in a fantasy world similar in many ways to Georgian England. Many people are superstitious, with goo…

What happens at the John Hewitt Summer School....

...stays at the John Hewitt Summer School. Mostly.

Rarely do I feel daunted when tackling a blog post but for this one I want to both capture the experience - warts (however few) and all - for others thinking of such an experience, and also try to put into words how the week has got me thinking about my writing and reflecting on lots of things. But anyway, nothing ventured etc etc, here goes.

Firstly, why on Earth did this little sff writer pop off to a literary festival for a week - apart from the small matter of the generosity of the John Hewitt Society in granting me a bursary. I could cite lots of things, like that I have a degree in humanties (I do - theatre and english), or that I do, actually, read the odd poem (MacNeice, Longley and Years are favourites as well as, added this week, Jane Yeh), or even that I've written a fairly literary fantasy book ( I have - coming in 2017.) But that's all just part of why I wanted to go. I also struggle to see why genre writing shoul…