Skip to main content

The process

Michael Ranson, when asked to describe himself usually dodges the question and tells a story, instead. He is, after all, a fiction writer and it can be a hard habit to break! On his new website, Ranson writes, he indulges in his life-long love of word craft and has a lot to say about how to get published and plans to follow his own advice later this year with the release of his first fantasy novel. In the meantime he writes reviews, publishing editorials and shares his views on everything from natural history to space travel. He has also kindly passed this blog-tour over to me.

 What am I working on?

Final edits of the first book of my space-opera trilogy (the Abendau trilogy), before publication in the autumn by Tickety-boo press. I have a few other irons in the pan which are based in Ulster, so when I jump between wips I have to take care not to bring the accents with me! And I've just started a fun new YA sci-fi project.

How does my work differ from others in its genre?

For science fiction, it's very character focused. It also focuses on the fall-out of a horrific ordeal on all the characters involved rather than glossing over the events and trivialising them. I like to think there's a warmth to the characters and the world that's a little different from some sci-fi. It's unashamedly soft and fast-paced - I leave the science stuff to those who like that sort of thing! It's also dark in places and that juxtaposes against the humanity of the characters.

Why do I write what I do?

Partly for escapism - Abendau is my world and I'm proud of creating it.

On a more serious note, I wanted to present an existentialist hero, guided by morals and beliefs which are strong enough to be challenged. I wanted my hero to be quite different - non-macho, whilst very much a leader, and driven by his principles - the Steve Covey of the sci-fi world.

I also wanted real relationships, not people thrown together for the plot. None of my characters don't have flaws, few have no redeeming features (well, maybe one.) As the trilogy grows, they grow too, and I feel that's important, that things don't stay static from book to book.

How does my writing process work?

I write best in the afternoon and, like most new writers, have a day job which pays the bills. I try to work in the morning and write in the afternoon up to about five. I then edit and crit in the evenings. As writing becomes more dominant I'm using more of my mornings for non-writing activities to support that - research, blogging, social media - to leave the creative part of my day free. As I have a young family, it's all a bit of a juggling act.

I start with a character and germ of an idea and splurge out a horrid first draft. My strength is dialogue and characterisation and even in this terrible draft the dialogue will form and, often, rarely change.

I then start to inflict it on beta partners who give me feedback to sulk and mull over until I'm ready with the new shape in my mind, which I start to fill out.

I'm a better rewriter than writer, so by draft three things are coming together and then it's about expanding the sparse first draft and tidying up the point of views. I'll happily change point of views, because I'm dialogue-rich I don't find this too onerous, and when it's tidy my agent will see it, at which point her feedback will guide me to the changes and a butterfly emerges that stuns me a little.

I have two fabulous writers who are going to take the baton from me:

Emma Tett, a fabulous writer who, as well as her sff writing, has two novels coming out in 2014: Otherworld (co-authored with Liz Powell) from Torquere Press (November), and Shuttered from Dreamspinner Press (December).

She has also published many, many, many short stories — here’s a link to her blog, which contains a full bibliography.

Anna Dickinson, one of my fabulous writing group, who writes amazing, heart-in-your-mouth YA fantasy. She's repped by the amazing Jessica Negron from Talcott-Notch agency, and her blog can be found here:


Popular posts from this blog

A NATURAL HISTORY OF GOBLINS - a guest blog by Teresa Edgerton

Some fantasy writers like to write about elves, others prefer werewolves, vampires, or zombies. I have a penchant for goblins.

In folklore, the word "goblin" has been applied in myriad ways. A goblin might be a mischievous sprite like Puck, a hideous, vengeful ghost, or even a beneficient house spirit such as a brownie. Sometimes it was used as a synonym for fairy, sometimes applied to a separate race: small, ugly, and malicious. I've taken advantage of this ambiguity, and in each series of books I've written where goblins appear, I've reinvented them.

In the second Celydonn series (sequels to The Green Lion Trilogy) they are fuathan, bad fairies if you will. I like writing about fairies. Even the best of them are not nice; they are not benevolent. On occasion they may be extravagently generous. Grateful for small favors, they return them with magnificent gifts and spectacular rewards. But you cannot trust them. Their morality is not our morality, their laws…

Getting hearts racing, an interview with fantasy-romance novelist Suzanne Jackson

Today I'm chatting with Suzanne Jackson, whose debut novel has been picked up by Venus Ascending, a new fantasy/sci-fi romance imprint headed up by Teresa Edgerton. I'm lucky enough to be a critique partner of Sue's, and can confirm that this book is something special with a great, unique world, sumptuous writing, a fantastic female lead, and the so-bad-he's-irresistible Nicholas Jarrett.
So I thought I'd be the first to nab the elusive Suzanne and find out what makes her - and her world - tick.


Firstly, tell us a little about your world, and how you've managed to marry fantasy with romance?

Hi, Jo. Thank you for inviting me onto your blog for my very first interview. I’m thrilled to be able to talk a little bit about my book and characters.
The Beguiler is set in a fantasy world similar in many ways to Georgian England. Many people are superstitious, with goo…


This week a theme has emerged over my conversations and interactions, almost organically. That theme is about communities and how they can give a voice and strength to the individuals within it. I’m a member of a range of writing communities. Some, such as Women Aloud and the SFFchronicles, I’m pretty central to. Some, less so:
Despite having a reputation for writing some dark scenes, my work isn’t dark enough to be classed as grimdark*. And I don’t read a whole heap of Grimdark books (the odd one slips through my eclectic book-selection part of my brain, but so does the odd macho-man romance.) But I like the Grimdark community grimdark fiction readers & writers – they’re funny and warm (I know, I know, they really need to up their grim credentials) and very welcoming. And moderated as tightly as a group needs to be. So, I hang around and post the odd comment and chat with the odd member – not that they’re all odd, of course – and that’s as far as it needs to go. The group have …